> On Sat, 22 Apr 1995, B.K. DeLong wrote:
> > comp.vr.vrml wins hands down!
>
> Cool. My only concern about that was that the lack of a "comp.vr" may
> cause some USENET cops to protest, but maybe that won't be too bad. Many
> thanks to BK for carrying this through.
I wonder what the newsgroup hierarchy of comp.vr will eventually grow to ?
comp.vr.software.< insert language name >
comp.vr.protocol.< insert propocol name >
comp.vr.hardware.< insert company name >.< insert company product >
anyone else want to make any guesses?
( and should we have a plan for growth?)