Re: !!!!Voting Results for VRML Newsgroup!!!!

Mark Waks ([email protected])
Mon, 24 Apr 95 13:08:58 EDT

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: todd.robertson: "Re[2]: MISC"
Previous message: Chris Goad: "internal-vs-external behaviors"
Maybe in reply to: B.K. DeLong: "!!!!Voting Results for VRML Newsgroup!!!!"

Marc suggests:
>I don't mean to open another can of worms so soon after we've finished the
>first, but I'd like to suggest that 'comp.vr.vrml' not be created in
>isolation. Am I correct in believing that if it were, it would be the only
>VR group in the 'comp' hierarchy? We should add at least one group, such
>as 'comp.vr.misc', or maybe 'comp.vr.phil', to draw off non-technical
>discussions.

Hmm; good point. I agree -- we should probably try to create comp.vr.misc
at the same time, so we have a base for general discussion. (Besides, this
is the norm for creating new hierarchies.)

-- Justin
Who still prefers comp.cyberspace, but
will survive...

Random Quote du Jour:

"I'm the head of Intelligence! Do you take me for a perfect idiot?"
"No one's perfect."
-- The Avengers

Next message: todd.robertson: "Re[2]: MISC"
Previous message: Chris Goad: "internal-vs-external behaviors"
Maybe in reply to: B.K. DeLong: "!!!!Voting Results for VRML Newsgroup!!!!"