Re: relative URLs VRML viewed from HTML-browsers
Jim Terhorst ([email protected])
Fri, 12 May 1995 13:28:49 -0600
On May 12, 12:03pm, Brian Behlendorf wrote:
> But the helper application shouldn't have to rely on browser behavior
> this way. Steffen brought up a very good point, and I can't believe I
> didn't notice this sooner. Tony, is there still time to get this into
> 1.0, you think? If not there, 1.1, and then I guess it'll be 1.1 that we
> take to the IETF.
This brings up an interesting question. What will the process be for
proposing additions to 1.0 for 1.1? I would really like to get the
ElevationGrid node into 1.1. Is there anybody out there who thinks
the same? If i'm the only one who wants it, i'll take my idea and go
home:) Seriously though, if ya think this node should be in 1.1,
then say so here.
jim terhorst (MountainTop::Computing) [email protected]