>
> > Is it that it makes the node too complex, or that the existing Inventor
> > node doesn't handle annotation text? Somehow it doesn't seem to me that
> > adding one boolean to the node overloads it too much. However, leaving it
> > off of the spec. hampers text usage for a lot of serious applications.
> >
> > How about a vote on the issue?
>
> My vote goes to adding the 'annotation' flag at the SEPERATOR node -
> may as well allow any object, including text, to be self-aligning.
> It is then up to the browser as to how it should treat this flag.
Now we're getting somewhere! I vote YES for this instead of adding the
flag to the text node. The only change I would propose is to change the
field name to fixed_orientation instead of annotation.
Len Wanger -- [email protected]
Interactive Simulations Inc.
http://www.intsim.com/~isigen