I would have to agree with what is being said about VRML being a seperate
entity from the WWW, that should stand on it's own two feet. Instead of
thinking of VRML as the Web's little brother, we should just think of it as
it's brother. It seems that most VRML browsers will be meant to work as a
companion to a WWW broswer, OR they are stand alone. So it is safe to say
that a particular user may soon have the _choice_ of browsing the Net
through WWW or VRML. So consider the two protocols independent forms of
GUI's for the Net.
I vote for comp.infosystems.vrml
This vote comes from a WWW enthusiast, and content writer - so you have an
opinion from someone who isn't involved in the technical side of VRML.
-Ross