Very true.
. VRML is a networking technology, and is integral to the web, not to computer
. graphics. It was created by the web commmunity for the web community. I
. believe that the right place in the USENET hierarchy is
. comp.infosystems.www.vrml - thus, as we add more web-based features, and
. more non-graphics features (remember, this is not a graphics problem but a
. networking problem) we won't be seen as "hijacking" a newsgroup. And, we're
. much more likely to benefit from the sage advise of people who have strong
. networking chops; something we'll need.
Bzt, wrong. The *only* thing that VRML and WWW share is the use of
URLs. By the same stretch of the imagination we could call the
newsgroup:
comp.graphics.inventor.vrml
VRML is much more inventor than it is HTML/WWW..
My vote goes for comp.infosystems.vrml.
Who wants to be burdened with past efforts. Remember folks, we're
creating a whole new world here.
-- | Paul Lindner | [email protected] | Slipping into madness | | Distributed Computing Services | is good for the sake | Gophermaster | University of Minnesota | of comparison. ///// / / / /////// / / / / / / / / //// / / / / / / / /