Re: VRML Usenet newsgroup
Michael Sweet ([email protected])
Mon, 17 Apr 1995 20:55:38 -0400
On Apr 17, 5:21pm, Andy Norris wrote:
> Subject: Re: VRML Usenet newsgroup
> At 05:49 PM 4/17/95 -0400, B.K. DeLong wrote:
> >>Does that make sense? Is anyone working on this?
> >
> >If there is no argument, I will work on it. I think a newsgroup will help
> >let the public know what is going on and what is up and coming etc. Any
> >opposition?
>
> There was a (unresolved, I believe) discussion a couple of weeks ago as to
> where it should go in the Usenet heirarchy. As I recall, comp.graphics,
> comp.infosystems, and comp.lang were among those discussed. Before we start
> creating newsgroups we need this resolved.
>
> Who disagrees with trying to create comp.graphics.vrml.design and
> comp.graphics.vrml.users?
>
The ".design" name is appropriate, but I think ".apps" would be better (read:
more consistent with the comp.graphics hierarchy) than ".users". It also
leaves
the obvious breakdown into subgroups for specific browsers...
--
______________________________________________________________________________
Mike Sweet 2D & 3D Software for Easy Software Products
(301) 994-0377 Silicon Graphics, Inc. 20778 Wolftrap Street
[email protected] Workstations Lexington Park, MD 20653
http://www.easysw.com
______________________________________________________________________________