>I guess I'm looking for some concensus on the polite way of adding new
>features to the VRML spec. Something like:
>
>1. Implement as an experimental feature. Implement in such a way that
> users know that they are using an experimental feature
>2. Propose to VRML mailing list. Discuss, debate, convince.
>3. Others implement/use the new feature.
>4. New feature becomes part of the "official" VRML spec.
I like his proposal. It's organic. How about you all?
I raise this question now because I'm going to suggest that some of the more
popularly requested features, such as sound, be omitted from the 1.0 spec.
However, I would like a way for the community to keep moving on feature
development before we settle on a version 1.x spec baseline.
What does everybody think?
____________________________________________________________________________
Intervista Software
Internet Visualization
415 648-2749
Tony Parisi
President [email protected]
____________________________________________________________________________