Re: VRML - The next step?
steve ([email protected])
Wed, 5 Apr 1995 09:35:27 +0000
> I envision this system as the renderer and interaction parts of a VRML-like
> system split out, with a defined API, common across platforms and
> implementations. The main reason I think this kind of system is a good idea is
> because it lets people who build renderers build great renderers, and lets
> people who write parsers, language tools, multi-person interactive spaces
> (M**'s), etc, concentrate on them, not on rendering concerns, or how to map a
> mouse click into 3-d space. It makes hacking a new 3-d paradigm more plausible
> than it is currently.
You have just described dVS - this is a commercial VR product
available from Division Inc, North Carolina. I have received a number of
requests recently on the dVS architecture, and I am preparing a paper
which I will circulate soon.
Steve
>>-------------------------------------<<
Steve Ghee ( [email protected] )
Director of Technology
Division Ltd
19 Apex Court
Woodlands
Almondsbury
Bristol, UK
BS12 4JT
Tel : +44 1454 615554
Fax : +44 1454 615532
>>-------------------------------------<<