Re: Is VRML 1.0 done?

Gavin Nicol ([email protected])
Tue, 4 Apr 1995 10:11:46 -0400

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: David Peck: "Re: VRML - The next step?"
Previous message: Jan Hardenbergh: "Is VRML 1.0 done?"
Maybe in reply to: Jan Hardenbergh: "Is VRML 1.0 done?"

>I believe there is no concensus on text (messages, bitmap, 2d geom, 3d geom)
>(Do we do the right thing and specify Unicode?) Perhaps, picking an
>extension that is not part of the "standard" is best for now.

Specifying Unicode is not a good thing. Text strings should have 2
associated parameters specifying the character set, and encoding.

Next message: David Peck: "Re: VRML - The next step?"
Previous message: Jan Hardenbergh: "Is VRML 1.0 done?"
Maybe in reply to: Jan Hardenbergh: "Is VRML 1.0 done?"