#1 It *DOES* break things, it breaks things that people will want to do in
the future, it's a kludge and it's not orthogonal with the rest of the
system; that's why I'm against it.
#2 You have not presented a single valid case for ';' being part of the
CGI spec and we have presented several arguments against it.
Server side includes are *NOT* part of the CGI spec and would require
seperate consideration. Perhaps Rob will address this issue.
This *is* a good point, and something that needs to be addressed but
it doesn't affect CGI (not directly anyway).
> Of course, if your running on a RS/6000 with lots of memory (as I am) spawning
> and executing are virtually instantaneous as its all out of ram, and nothing
> ever hits the disk or network.
...
> It is rediculus that to serve up documents I must spawn a huge scripting
> language to emulate a server (which I already have running!).
Do I detect a contradiction here? :-)
--sanders