Re: Semicolon's for all

Marc Andreessen ([email protected])
Fri, 31 Dec 93 18:44:35 -0600

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Tony Sanders: "Re: Semicolon's for all"
Previous message: Charles Henrich: "Re: Semicolon's for all"
Maybe in reply to: Charles Henrich: "Semicolon's for all"
Next in thread: Tony Sanders: "Re: Semicolon's for all"

Charles Henrich writes:
> What happens in a year when folks want to add something and CGI is
> well entrenched?

Then CGI/1.1 is spec'd and stabilized.

One of the points behind CGI/1.0 was to reach a point of stability wrt
shifting and nontransportable script interfaces; that this stability
has been reached at the "1.0" level is a good thing.

Cheers,
Marc

--
Marc Andreessen
Enterprise Integration Technologies
Palo Alto, California
[email protected]

Next message: Tony Sanders: "Re: Semicolon's for all"
Previous message: Charles Henrich: "Re: Semicolon's for all"
Maybe in reply to: Charles Henrich: "Semicolon's for all"
Next in thread: Tony Sanders: "Re: Semicolon's for all"