Re: <FIG> implies <P>?

lilley ([email protected])
Thu, 13 Jul 1995 13:40:53 +0100 (BST)


Mike Batchelor wrote:

> Why should it be this way? I can't think of any compelling reason why a
> <FIG> has to imply a paragraph break.

> > >xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >xxxxxxxxxxxxxx +-----+
> > >xxxxxxxxxxxxxx | |
> > >xxxxxxxxxxxxxx | |
> > >xxxxxxxxxxxxxx | |
> > >xxxxxxxxxxxxxx +-----+
> > >xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

How would you suggest laying out the following, assuming FIG can be
contained inside P:

<P CLASS="outer">xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx etc etc
<FIG ALIGN="RIGHT" SRC="blah.png"><CAPTION>Something</CAPTION><P>yyyyy</P>
<H3>Minor heading</H3><P>zzzzz</P></FIG>
more xxxxxxxxxxxxx</P>

and would the string "more xxxxxxxx" be contained in a P of class outer?

It sounds as if you are asking for arbitrary nesting of paragraphs etc
inside other paragraphs.

-- 
Chris Lilley, Technical Author
+-------------------------------------------------------------------+
|       Manchester and North HPC Training & Education Centre        |
+-------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Computer Graphics Unit,             Email: [email protected] |
| Manchester Computing Centre,        Voice: +44 161 275 6045       |
| Oxford Road, Manchester, UK.          Fax: +44 161 275 6040       |
| M13 9PL                            BioMOO: ChrisL                 |
|     URI: http://info.mcc.ac.uk/CGU/staff/lilley/lilley.html       | 
+-------------------------------------------------------------------+