Re: Intellectual Property Trap.

Anthony Parisi ([email protected])
Wed, 13 Dec 1995 17:13:50 -0800 (PST)

>
> I think most of us agree that if the above line deals with the source
> code then we can live with that. Sounds fair. But we want the protocol
> in the PD. Or at least, the version of ActiveVRML we decide should be
> associated with VRML should be in the PD (like what happened to
> OpenInventor - we can modify the VRML spec but at the same time SGI can
> modify the OpenInventor spec).
>
>

There is no protocol. It's a data format.

Do you mean that you want the spec. for the data format in the PD?

  • Next message: Anthony Parisi: "Re: Intellectual Property Trap."
  • Previous message: Omar Eljumaily: "Re: Charging for ActiveVRML"
  • In reply to: Neophytos Iacovou: "Re: Intellectual Property Trap."
  • Next in thesad: Anthony Parisi: "Re: Intellectual Property Trap."