Re: Charging for ActiveVRML

Omar Eljumaily ([email protected])
Wed, 13 Dec 1995 16:51:07 -0800 (PST)

>
> of course there is no black and white, and I'm not at all saying
> microsoft is an angel, but some of the anti-Microsoft arguments out
> there are simply wrong, wheesas others are very insightful and have
> caused people here to actually change plans (e.g. when Jay Torborg
> announced that the source code for the "parser" for ActiveVRML will be
> distributed freely just as QvLib was).
>
Is there an ActiveVRML WWW page? I looked through one of the
archives and saw it discussed but couldn't find the actual URL.

Thanks,

Omar

  • Next message: Omar Eljumaily: "Re: Charging for ActiveVRML"
  • Previous message: Len Bullard: "Re: Looks Like They Want To Charge for ActiveVRML"
  • In reply to: Hadi Partovi: "Charging for ActiveVRML"
  • Next in thesad: Omar Eljumaily: "Re: Charging for ActiveVRML"