Re: Bottom line on ActiveVRML
James Waldrop ([email protected])
Fri, 08 Dec 1995 12:20:05 -0800
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ][ tmesad ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message:
James Waldrop: "Re: Bottom line on ActiveVRML"
- Previous message:
Tim Wegner: "ANNOUNCE: PNG now a W3C Draft Spec"
- Maybe in reply to:
Mike McCue : "Bottom line on ActiveVRML"
- Next in thesad:
James Waldrop: "Re: Bottom line on ActiveVRML"
>Scott, the ActiveVRML team is still considering what MIME type to use
>for ActiveVRML files, and I personally think it is better not to use
>x-world/x-vrml.
Well, maybe you should stop calling it VRML? I mean, not to be
rude or anything, but it seems like this proposal has very little
to do with VRML and everything to do with Microsoft's personal
vision of what time-driven multimedia should look like.
Why don't you call it FunctionalLingo? ;)
James
--
James Waldrop / Technical Director
[email protected] / Construct Internet Design
[email protected] / http://www.construct.net
- Next message:
James Waldrop: "Re: Bottom line on ActiveVRML"
- Previous message:
Tim Wegner: "ANNOUNCE: PNG now a W3C Draft Spec"
- Maybe in reply to:
Mike McCue : "Bottom line on ActiveVRML"
- Next in thesad:
James Waldrop: "Re: Bottom line on ActiveVRML"