Re: Bottom line on ActiveVRML
[email protected]
Fri, 8 Dec 1995 10:53:44 -0800
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ][ tmesad ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message:
[email protected]: "Re: Bottom line on ActiveVRML"
- Previous message:
Colin Campbell: "RE: Bottom line on ActiveVRML"
>
>Any name suggestions out there? Because AV is a 4D modeling language,
>it really is a natural extension for the VRML 3D modeling language.
>
>Colin
>
Just because AV is 4D does not make it VR. There is a MIME spec
proposal which includes both 3D and 4D (and higher) data types.
VRML is a subtype in this spec. There are other 3D and 4D
objects also.
Scott Nelson
--
+----------------------------------------------------+
|Scott D. Nelson B131 Rm2074 3-1250 |
|Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory |
|7000 East Ave., L-153 Livermore CA 94550 |
|email: [email protected] http://www-dsed.llnl.gov/ |
+----------------------------------------------------+
- Next message:
[email protected]: "Re: Bottom line on ActiveVRML"
- Previous message:
Colin Campbell: "RE: Bottom line on ActiveVRML"