Re: ANNOUNCE: VRML 2.0 proposal from Microsoft graphics groups

James Waldrop ([email protected])
Thu, 07 Dec 1995 22:34:26 -0800

Chris Marrin wrote:
>Of course, the other advantage of putting it inside VRML is it gives
>authors a choice of progeamming models. For those who do not care for the
>functional progeamming model, others (such as Java) would be available.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

I felt this could bear repeating.

James

--
James Waldrop                        /          Technical Director
[email protected]              /              Construct Internet Design
[email protected]               /                  http://www.construct.net

  • Next message: James Waldrop: "Re: ANNOUNCE: VRML 2.0 proposal from Microsoft graphics groups"
  • Previous message: Salim AbiEzzi: "RE: ActiveVRML: nice but orthogonal"
  • Maybe in reply to: [email protected]: "ANNOUNCE: VRML 2.0 proposal from Microsoft graphics groups"
  • Next in thesad: James Waldrop: "Re: ANNOUNCE: VRML 2.0 proposal from Microsoft graphics groups"