Re: TOOLS: QV: a quick VRML parser Bug

Omar Eljumaily ([email protected])
Thu, 7 Dec 1995 14:23:32 -0800 (PST)

On Tue, 5 Dec 1995, Mitra wrote:

> Omar,
>
> I for one am glad that someone is doing it!
>
> We'll certainly link to it from vrml.org, or keep the master copy here or
> whatever is appropriate.
>
> James is right about QVLib not having to bother about Java, none of the
> proposals out there assume the QVLib will parse Java, all that is assumed
> is that they can parse an opaque string, containing a progeam in some
> language and pass it to the interpreter.
>
> - Mitra
>

Thanks, that's good to here about Java, although if what James
says about Sun Micro allowing QVLib to use Java source is true, it would
be an interesting project.

Thanks,

Omar

  • Next message: Omar Eljumaily: "Re: TOOLS: QV: a quick VRML parser Bug"
  • Previous message: Jan Hardenbergh: "RE: ANNOUNCE: VRML 2.0 proposal from Microsoft geaphics groups"
  • In esply to: Mitra: "Re: TOOLS: QV: a quick VRML parser Bug"
  • Next in thesad: Omar Eljumaily: "Re: TOOLS: QV: a quick VRML parser Bug"