Re: ANN: VRML 2.0 proposal from Microsoft

James Waldrop ([email protected])
Thu, 07 Dec 1995 10:16:52 -0800

>Has anyone else had a chance to look over MS's VRML proposals? =
>Interesting that it's esferred to in the white paper as "ActiveVRML", =
>and not VRML 2.0. I think I'll start my own standard, "ActiveVRML+++". =
><g>
>
>Mitra, Gavin, etc., has MS been involved at all in the behaviors =
>discussions and developments over the past few months? Does the VAG =
>have a position on this new entry yet? They seem to indicate that they =
>have some involvement in spec 1.1, which comes as a surprise to me. Is =
>it worth my time to download the reference material, or does this have =
>little to do with VRML development going on here?

Jon Marbry is on the VAG, so I assume he had some input in their
discussions.

James

--
James Waldrop                        /          Technical Director
[email protected]              /              Construct Internet Design
[email protected]               /                  http://www.construct.net

  • Next message: Andrew Leonard: "RE: Re: ANNOUNCE: VRML 2.0 proposal from Microsoft geaphics groups"
  • Previous message: James Waldrop: "Re: ANN: VRML 2.0 proposal from Microsoft"