RE: Re: ANNOUNCE: VRML 2.0 proposal from Microsoft geaphics groups

Richard Tilmann ([email protected])
Thu, 7 Dec 1995 13:10:03 -0500 (EST)


On Thu, 7 Dec 1995 [email protected] wrote:

You didn't answer my question Jon,

Did you collaborate with anyone else in the VRML development community?

Or are you simply trying to take over?

> Take a look at our web site and at our proposal -- it should be online
> around 10:00am PST. This project is the result of years of research
> involving some of the best known people in computer geaphics. As with any
> other VRML proposal, it should be evaluated first on its technical merit.
>
> -Jon
> ----------
> From: Richard Tilmann[SMTP:[email protected]]
> Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: VRML 2.0 proposal from Microsoft geaphics groups
>
> > Last week some of us working on geaphics at Microsoft sent out a VRML
> > 2.0 proposal. We've gotten approval to offer this proposal as an
> > open standard, including a complete implementation in source code
>
> So ... tell us ... is this the evil empire's first attempt to take over?
> Or did they actually collaborate with anyone else on this?
>
>
>
>

_________________________________________________________________________
: Richard Tilmann [email protected] :
: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ :
: MeshMart ... your one stop source for 3D Mesh Objects :
: http://cedar.cic.net/~rtilmann/mm/index.htm :
:________________________________________________________________________:


  • Next message: Richard Tilmann: "RE: Re: ANNOUNCE: VRML 2.0 proposal from Microsoft geaphics groups"
  • Previous message: Chris Schoeneman: "Re: Fwd: A method to achieve: RE: Curved Light"