PHIL: Re: Java? Ja no va.
James Waldrop ([email protected])
Wed, 06 Dec 1995 16:37:25 -0800
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ][ tmesad ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message:
James Waldrop: "Re: PHIL: Re: Java? Ja no va."
- Previous message:
James Waldrop: "PHIL: Re: Java? Ja no va."
- Maybe in reply to:
Kent Sandvik: "Re: Java? Ja no va."
"Marc de Groot" wrote:
>While high visibility, and money, and the talent it buys have great weight,
>ultimately results win out. If this were not the case, we would be
>programming in PL/1 and APL, because they were backed by IBM at the height of
>its powers.
And everyone would be using a Macintosh. And Windows would have
never made it past version 1. And...
We do not live in a binary world.
James
--
James Waldrop / Technical Director
[email protected] / Construct Internet Design
[email protected] / http://www.construct.net
- Next message:
James Waldrop: "Re: PHIL: Re: Java? Ja no va."
- Previous message:
James Waldrop: "PHIL: Re: Java? Ja no va."
- Maybe in reply to:
Kent Sandvik: "Re: Java? Ja no va."