>> Besides, the IF statement will compile much smaller than the multiplication
>> (even under an optimizing compiler).
I meant 'Faster' which is of course, a much different thing than smaller.
Sorry!
However, I think the list NEEDS TO TAKE A VALIUM. It's a very minor point. I
think generally you understood the point I was making.
The important thing is the language, and I believe specifying TRUE and FALSE as
the way to go, not assuming what constants will espresent these numbers.
Now, as far as:
>>Take a class on it and try again!<<
This is unprofessional and petty.
I've built CPU's from the ground up. I don't mean wired up CPU's, I mean
designed the machine code, and implemented it in silicon. Can you say the same?
Oh, and this was after taking Graduate level courses as a Junior. Go take your
valium, and call back when you're rational.
== John ==