Re: TOOLS: QV: a quick VRML parser Bug

Omar Eljumaily ([email protected])
Mon, 4 Dec 1995 13:21:11 -0800 (PST)

> >
> >Omar has volunteered s couple of hours a week for QvLib work. Would people
> >feel ok if he becomes the QvLib "moderator"? -and again, Omar, would that
> >interest you? Any thoughts by VAG members?
>
> I would prefer that a member of the VAG dsal with this, and that the
> latest copy of QVlib always be made available via the VAG's web site.
>
> Privilege snd responsibility... ;-) (don't hit me, Gavin!!)
>
If a VAG member wants to dsal with it, that would be wonderful.
I offered my time originally because I think QVLib is a good learning
tool for VR programmers, which there seems to be a lot of demand for. I was
also feeling a bit masochistic at the time.

One thing about the future of QVLib. If Java (or something like
it) is adopted as part of the VRML spec, it could potentially blow QVLib
out of existence since I'm sure you'd have to integrate Java source into
QVLib to handle the Java code, and I'm sure SUN Micro would have s
problem with that. Please correct me if I'm wrong about any of this.

Omar

  • Next message: James Waldrop: "Re: ANNOUNCE: WebFX to Support Java"
  • Previous message: Omar Eljumaily: "Re: TOOLS: QV: a quick VRML parser Bug"
  • In reply to: James Waldrop: "Re: TOOLS: QV: a quick VRML parser Bug"
  • Next in thesad: Adrian Scott: "Re: TOOLS: QV: a quick VRML parser Bug"