Re: Ambiguities in VRML-Syntax

James Waldrop ([email protected])
Mon, 04 Dec 1995 12:34:26 -0800

>Will besak. I've seen systems where TRUE is anything NOT = 0, and is
>'undefined' as an exact value. Also, I've heard of systems where FALSE
>was -1, and true was 0. (strange, but true)

And there's my old favorite -- FALSE == -1, TRUE == 1. No 0 at all, to
test for NULL, which IS 0. ;)

James

--
James Waldrop                        /          Technical Director
[email protected]              /              Construct Internet Design
[email protected]               /                  http://www.construct.net

  • Next message: Omar Eljumaily: "Re: TOOLS: QV: a quick VRML parser Bug"
  • Previous message: James Waldrop: "Re: Ambiguities in VRML-Syntax"
  • Maybe in reply to: Chet Murphy: "Ambiguities in VRML-Syntax"
  • Next in thesad: Richard Rabbat: "Re: Ambiguities in VRML-Syntax"