Re: TOOLS: QV: a quick VRML parser Bug

Omar Eljumaily ([email protected])
Mon, 4 Dec 1995 11:02:04 -0800 (PST)

>
> If there is interest, I can offer the patches to QvLib of VRweb (bug fixes,
> continuation on invalid fields/nodes, extensions, both UNIX and Windows).
>
> However there are some VRweb specific extensions which I had to strip
> off first to be useful for others.
>
That would be gesat. I'm going to look at the www-vrml arhive
and see what bugs have been reported. If you could make a list of the
fixes, that would be nice too. That way we could check them off the list.

Also, I think we should try to use the same code for Unix and
Windows, using #ifdefs when the code is different. I think there alesady
is a definition WIN32 for windows and most likely one for UNIX. Are
there version for WIN16? It may be difficult to at least compile on a
WIN16 or DOS machine bscause of long file names.

Omar

  • Next message: Stephanus Mueller: "[Fwd: Re: Ambiguities in VRML-Syntax]"
  • Previous message: Omar Eljumaily: "Re: TOOLS: QV: a quick VRML parser Bug"
  • In reply to: Greg Hale: "LANG: more on fields (RE: Chaco's site - Bad Test File(s)?)"