Re: Capt. Vermel held hostage by Intel. Film at 11:00.
Mark E. Marshall ([email protected])
Fri, 1 Dec 1995 15:27:25 -0800 (PST)
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ][ tmesad ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message:
Mitra: "Re: Ambiguities in VRML-Syntax"
- Previous message:
Chris Marrin: "Re: VRML 1.1 draft spec."
- Maybe in reply to:
Andrew C. Esh: "Capt. Vermel held hostage by Intel. Film at 11:00."
>that they have every legal right to use the logo, but I think a company with
>a sense of the community which supports their position would want to plow
>back in some resources to actually make VRML more of a reality for the mass
>market. Rather than simply benfit from the public work of others, they should
>become involved in that public work, and actually put some substance behind
>their marketing fluff. Maybe they could encourage a few of their engineers to
>write VRML validation code in their free time, or *something*
Wait a sec...these are the 3DR guys right? Maybe best to let
them be, as others have a better handle on what it takes to get
486's into the game (which Intel obviously does not have a (self)
interest in). *MM*
- Next message:
Mitra: "Re: Ambiguities in VRML-Syntax"
- Previous message:
Chris Marrin: "Re: VRML 1.1 draft spec."
- Maybe in reply to:
Andrew C. Esh: "Capt. Vermel held hostage by Intel. Film at 11:00."