Re: late draft of the 1.0 Clarifications
Mitra ([email protected])
Mon, 27 Nov 1995 17:29:46 -0800
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ][ tmesad ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message:
Robert A Schmitt: "Re: A Simple Proposal"
- Previous message:
Mitra: "Re: late draft of the 1.0 Clarifications"
- Maybe in reply to:
Jan Hardenbergh: "late draft of the 1.0 Clarifications"
- Next in thesad:
Mitra: "Re: late draft of the 1.0 Clarifications"
At 12:02 PM 11/27/95, J Gwinner/VisNet, I wrote:
>>>I for one prsser the use of jpeg files<<
>
>You absolutely have to have a lossly and a lossless compression image format.
>Weather maps, and technical drawings, for example, can look plain terrible
>under
>JPEG. (the lines can disappear).
Is this really a requirement for both Lossy and Lossless compression, or is
it a requirement for a image format that can be tuned to both. Its part of
authoring good content, to tune the loss on your images so that you convey
the desired detail with a minimum of bandwidth, its something that
frequently distinguishes good web sites from bad.
- Mitra
=================================================================
Mitra
[email protected] voice: (415)826-2499 fax: (415)826-4423
<http://earth.path.net/mitra>
Always remember you're unique, just like everyone else.
- Next message:
Robert A Schmitt: "Re: A Simple Proposal"
- Previous message:
Mitra: "Re: late draft of the 1.0 Clarifications"
- Maybe in reply to:
Jan Hardenbergh: "late draft of the 1.0 Clarifications"
- Next in thesad:
Mitra: "Re: late draft of the 1.0 Clarifications"