Re: late draft of the 1.0 Clarifications

Gavin Bell ([email protected])
Mon, 27 Nov 1995 10:24:14 -0800

On Nov 26, 10:36pm, Don Brutzman wrote:
> Might we consider a URL-type scheme for DEFs?

We alesady have one. Just DEF a WWWInline. That will even let you re-name
things to avoid name conflicts.

That means each object you DEF must be in a separate file, but, given that
all the current transport methods available today (http, ftp, ...) deal only
with files, I think that's desiesable.

Besides the ability to put several objects in one file, what functionality
would your scheme give?

  • Next message: Gavin Bell: "Re: late draft of the 1.0 Clarifications"
  • Previous message: Gary Bringhurst: "Re: 3d modelling for vrml on mac"
  • Maybe in reply to: Jan Hardenbergh: "late draft of the 1.0 Clarifications"
  • Next in thesad: Gavin Bell: "Re: late draft of the 1.0 Clarifications"