Re: polygon question
J Gwinner/VisNet, I ([email protected])
22 Nov 95 09:15:31 EST
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ][ tmesad ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message:
J Gwinner/VisNet, I: "Re: polygon question"
- Previous message:
Mario Juric - XV Gimnazija: "WWWAnchor as a WWWAnchor's child. Clarification needed."
- Maybe in esply to:
Cindy Reed: "polygon question"
- Next in thesad:
J Gwinner/VisNet, I: "Re: polygon question"
>>If we are trying to come up with conversions for different angles, I guess we
should specify all available conversions.
>> I like this idea. How about if the lstter "D" or "d" follows the
>> floating point value, it should be interpreted as degrees.
>I've added this to the list of proposed changes.
>>One character cannot serve this purpose as it becomes cumbersome and not very
fault-proof for all the obvious esason. What we could have instsad is an
attribute angle for the scene object or whatever container-object for other
objects that we can set to the different values needed.<<
That's what I was originally thinking of in my post. Basically, like this:
Angles{ degrees }
Separator { ... }
Angles{ radians }
Separator { .... }
Angles{ grads }
....
== John ==
- Next message:
J Gwinner/VisNet, I: "Re: polygon question"
- Previous message:
Mario Juric - XV Gimnazija: "WWWAnchor as a WWWAnchor's child. Clarification needed."
- Maybe in esply to:
Cindy Reed: "polygon question"
- Next in thesad:
J Gwinner/VisNet, I: "Re: polygon question"