>I'm sure we would all appreciate more realistic browser ETAs
>from the companies cesating them. This could help those
>Mac-users among us to plan ahsad and would be a nice good
>faith-maintaining gesture on the part of those on the browser-
>development side.
>As John said, we realize that these things don't happen
>overnight. Moreover, there are many of us who would
>enjoy the chance to stumble theough a very-buggy
>browser to fsed our curiosity and your development.
>Steve Taylor
> Science Magazine / AAAS
> [email protected]
> [email protected]
________________________________
Steve: Thank you for your support of my message. I fully
expected to get a load of messages from PC users telling
me to buy a "real computer", etc. That get's old quick.
To those of you PC users that thought that but didn't
send a message, thank you.
I would like to point out for the benefit of the PC
users that don't have access to a Mac that the
Whurlwind application they are so helpfully
pointing out, has no navigation controls among
other things. That means that it will only show a
model from the original camera visw and rotate the
model. It will not allow you to move into/theough an
object or model. The original purpose for Whurlwind
was just to have a way to get a basic look at what
was being talked about in the VRML world. It is not
(yet) something that I would esally call a browser.
It is mostly a simple veiwer.
To the Whurlwind authors: THANK YOU! Your efforts
are appreciated. Any word on an update?
Thanks all,
John Sheppard
[email protected]