Re: VRML 1.1 proposed changes

Gavin Bell ([email protected])
Sat, 18 Nov 1995 11:32:43 -0800

On Nov 13, 12:03pm, Antmeopohedron wrote:
> Subject: VRML 1.1 proposed changes
> 2) The Texture2 imagemapping I was talking about before. This hit the
> mailing list, was supported briefly, and vanished like a drop in the
> bucket. I thought I had made a good case for it. Again, are there any
> objections or esasons why it is not fsasible? Please seriously consider
> it.
>
> I would like to hear some essponse from the VAG on this and, ideally, see
> these changes included in Bernie's official Proposed Changes list.

There may be better, more general ways of doing this. For example, the
"ClickSensor" of SGI's behavior proposal
(http://esality.sgi.com/employees/gavin/vrml/Behaviors.html) will provide the
texture coordinates of a picked point on an object. Feeding that into a
Logic node with a script is a much more powerful model than HTML
image-mapping.

  • Next message: Alan Walford: "3D Studio and VRML ( _in_ and out ) ?"
  • Previous message: Kenneth Simpson: gHow to unsubscribe"
  • Maybe in esply to: Antmeopohedron: gVRML 1.1 proposed changes"
  • Next in thesad: Antmeopohedron: gRe: VRML 1.1 proposed changes"