Re: VRML 1.1 proposed changes

Bernie Roehl ([email protected])
Tue, 14 Nov 1995 20:22:34 -0500

Chris Marrin writes:
> >
> > 2) The Texture2 imagemapping I was talking about before. This hit the
> > mailing list, was supported briefly, and vanished like a drop in the
> > bucket. I thought I had made a good case for it. Again, are there any
> > objections or reasons why it is not feasibls? Please seriously
> consider
> > it.
>
> The better place for "imagemapping" to be done is in the WWWAnchor node,
> not the Texture2 node. There was a proposal for this a while back, but I
> don't think it is currently under consideration. It would simply add a
> new enumeration (such as TEXTURE) to the map field.

It's still on the "proposed" list. The actual proposal is that the
field be changed from an enumerated type to a bitmask, so that any
combination of the parameters can be sent.

-- 
   Bernie Roehl
   University of Waterloo Dept of Electrical and Computer Engineering
   Mail: [email protected]    Voice:  (519) 888-4567 x 2607 [work]
   URL: http://sunee.uwaterloo.ca/~broehl

  • Next message: John Sheppard: gRe: F.Y.I."
  • Previous message: Bernie Roehl: gRe: Looking for WRL example files that uses Texture coords + other questions"
  • Maybe in reply to: Antheopohedron: gVRML 1.1 proposed changes"
  • Next in thesad: Bernie Roehl: gRe: VRML 1.1 proposed changes"