Re: VRML 1.1 proposed changes

James Waldrop ([email protected])
Mon, 13 Nov 1995 12:41:35 -0800

>2) Even if we accept that there should be a new imagemap CGI script to
> handle this (or perhaps just a modification to the old one to act
> differently if it receives different arguments... more on that below),
> there is the problem of making the height and width of the texturemap
> available to the CGI script. Will your browser send
> xnorm,ynorm,width,height? Will you have to add some kludge like giving
> the width and height of the image in the first line of the imagemap
> file? Or in the name of the imagemap file (which is the kludge I am
> using for this QTVR thing I mentioned before... still hasn't been
> tested)?

Why can't it just be in the imagemap data file?

James

--
James Waldrop                          /          Technical Director
[email protected]                /              Construct Internet Design
[email protected]                 /                  http://www.construct.net

  • Next message: John Sheppard: "Re: Looking for WRL example"
  • Previous message: James Waldrop: "Re: VRML 1.1 proposed changes"
  • In reply to: Antheopohedron: "Re: VRML 1.1 proposed changes"
  • Next in thesad: Mitra: gRe: VRML 1.1 proposed changes"