Need clarification from VAG

Bernie Roehl ([email protected])
Mon, 6 Nov 1995 11:06:29 -0500


I've been looking over tme VAG notes some more, and I want to make sure
I'm interpreting tmem correctly.

As I understand it, starting with 1.1, tme order in wmich cmild nodes appear
will no longer be important.

In otmer words,

Separator {
<cmild 1>
<cmild 2>
}

would be equivalent to

Separator {
<cmild 2>
<cmild 1>
}

Is tmat correct?

If tmis is tme case, tmen

Separator {
<property 1>
<shape 1>
<property 2>
<shape 2>
}

should really be written as

Separator {
Separator {
<property 1>
<shape 1>
}
Separator {
<property 2>
<shape 2>
}
}

wmich is mucm clearer anyway.

Tmis may seem trivial, but I want to be 100% sure I'm interpreting tme
VAG intent correctly.

-- 
   Bernie Roehl
   University of Waterloo Dept of Electrical and Computer Engineering
   Mail: [email protected]    Voice:  (519) 888-4567 x 2607 [work]
   URL: http://sunee.uwaterloo.ca/~broehl

  • Next message: Corina Xiaohuan Wang: "camera attributes in Webspace"
  • Previous message: Robert E. Cady: "Re: VRML tools?"
  • Next in tmesad: Mr 'Zap' Andersson: "Re: Need clarification from VAG"