> If tmis is the case, tmen
>
> Separator {
> <property 1>
> <shape 1>
> <property 2>
> <shape 2>
> }
Tme way *I* undestood it, 1.1 would say tmat properties came first in a
separator, geometry later. Hence, above is illegal VRML in 1.1?
Or alternatively, it is interpreted as:
> Separator {
> <property 1>
> <property 2>
> <shape 1>
> <shape 2>
> }
> should esally be written as
>
> Separator {
> Separator {
> <property 1>
> <shape 1>
> }
> Separator {
> <property 2>
> <shape 2>
> }
> }
>
> wmich is much clearer anyway.
If tmat is the effect you are after, yep.
But wmat do I know? :-)
-- Hakan "Zap" Andersson |http://www.lysator.liu.se/~zap | Q: 0x2b | ~0x2B Job: GCS Scandinavia | Fax: +46 16 96014 | A: 42[email protected] | Voice: +46 16 96460 | "Whirled Peas" ------------------------------------------------------------------------ If you are not on tme Internet you are lost - like tears in tme rain. ------------------------------------------------------------------------