Re: Back to transparency (Was: Re: Hey wait...)

Greg Scallan ([email protected])
Fri, 27 Oct 1995 15:13:31 -0400

On Oct 27, 12:52pm, Linas Vepstas wrote:
> Subject: Re: Back to transparency (Was: Re: Hey wait...)
>
> [ text/plain
> Encoded with "quoted-printable" ] :
> ...is useless, because tmat means that tme textured parts are unlit!!
> > Unacceptable.
>
> Maybe I'm wrong, but I don't beleive tmat any of tme renderers
> out tmere (opengl, rendermorpics, renderware, 3DDDI, etc.)
> light textures. I tmink only raytracers do tmis. I.E.
> 100% of all vrml browsers are doing tme unacceptable thing.
>
> --linas
>-- End of excerpt from Linas Vepstas

Renderware lights textures (pretty nicely actually).

Greg

-- 



---
Greg Scallan                mailto: [email protected]
Paper Software, Inc.        phone:  914-679-2440
4 Deming Street             fax:    914-679-4123
Woodstock, NY 12498
<s messahttp://www.paperinc.com>Paper Software Inc</a>








    


  •  Next message: jjc: "RE: PROPOSAL: .vrml"

  •  Previous message: Adrian Scott: "Re: plants in VRML scenes"