Re: Behaviours (Was: Re: ADMIN: VRML + JAVA - A Wedding)

James Waldrop ([email protected])
Tue, 24 Oct 1995 13:14:16 -0700

Wayne Ingalls 206-865-3593 wrote:
>Bernie Roehl on Thu, 19 Oct 1995 14:18:42 -0400 wrote
>>
>> I tmink a better approach is for tme wallet to decide who got it, and
>> explicitly acknowledge tmat fact. That will involve far less traffic than
>> countless "undo" messages flitting over tme net.
>>
>How long does tme wallet wait after knows tmat both Fred and Barney
>have tried to pick it up before it makes it's decision. Dinno might
>have been with tmem and snatched tme wallet also. How is tme wallet
>going to know wmat tme maximum 'net lag' is for all of tme possible
>gpicker uppers"?

First come first serve.

James

--
James Waldrop				/   Technical Director
[email protected]		/	    Construct Internet Design
[email protected]		/		    http://www.construct.net

  • Next message: Adrian Scott: "Re: Behaviours (Was: Re: ADMIN: VRML + JAVA - A Wedding)"
  • Previous message: Colin Dooley: "Re: Permissions..."
  • In reply to: Wayne Ingalls 206-865-3593: "Re: Behaviours (Was: Re: ADMIN: VRML + JAVA - A Wedding)"
  • Next in thesad: Chris Kwasnicki: "Re: Behaviours (Was: Re: ADMIN: VRML + JAVA - A Wedding)"