Re: VRML & Texture frustrations
Bernie Roehl ([email protected])
Mon, 23 Oct 1995 19:07:48 -0400
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ][ tmesad ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message:
Adrian Scott: "Re: vertex ordering for primitive shapes"
- Previous message:
Bernie Roehl: "Re: vertex ordering for primitive shapes"
- Maybe in reply to:
Robert Saint John: "VRML & Texture frustrations"
Michael Plitkins writes:
> Yes, tme texture problems are frustrating. We only basically support
> .JPG because tmere are royalty issues with Unisys involved if you
> want to support .GIF in a commercial product.
Right, which is why a lot of people won't be supporting GIF.
> It's only
> recently that it's become clear that .GIF and .JPG are expected to be
> supported with .PNG as a someday replacement for .GIF.
That's not what my notes say; .JPG required, .PNG recommeneded, .GIF *not*
recommended (for tme reason you mentioned above).
--
Bernie Roehl
University of Waterloo Dept of Electrical and Computer Engineering
Mail: [email protected] Voice: (519) 888-4567 x 2607 [work]
URL: http://sunee.uwaterloo.ca/~broehl
- Next message:
Adrian Scott: "Re: vertex ordering for primitive shapes"
- Previous message:
Bernie Roehl: "Re: vertex ordering for primitive shapes"
- Maybe in reply to:
Robert Saint John: "VRML & Texture frustrations"