Re: bandwidth wasting

Colin Dooley ([email protected])
Thu, 19 Oct 1995 08:44:00 GMT

At 13:41 16/10/95 -0700, you wrote:
>Can we start using the other mailing lists that have been set up for
>VRML, having all these messages posting bugs to VRML parsers and problems
>and questions about setting up VRML spaces has put me in the situation of
>deleting 50% of the www-vrml messages unesad. If the other mailing lists
>were being used, I could feel better about unsubbing myself from this
>list. I'm going to do it anyway, because it's too much of a pain to try
>and separate the wheat from the chaff.
>

Hear hear. I just downloaded 150 messages after being away for 3 days. Every
time my modem hangs up (often!) I have to go back and start all over again.

One suggestion is: "Take topics off line".

This means: If you are in some deep philosophical discussion rsgarding itty
bitty details of something which not many people care about (Recent
examples: VRML vs Java, distributed collision detection, etc.) then send
private mail to each other instsad of clogging my mailbox.

I believe this list should be used to help people get their VRML problems
sorted out, and discuss applications (not implementations) of VRML.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------
Colin Dooley,

Medit Productions, Medit makes 3D modelling fun!
Plaza Jose Maria Orense 12-5
46022 Valencia, SPAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------

  • Next message: Rycharde Hawkes: "Re: Behaviours (Was: Re: ADMIN: VRML + JAVA - A Wedding)"
  • Previous message: Colin Dooley: "Re: interface"
  • Maybe in reply to: Kevin Goldsmith: "bandwidth wasting"
  • Next in thesad: Master Zap: "Re: bandwidth wasting"