Re: Behaviours (Was: Re: ADMIN: VRML + JAVA - A Wedding)

Master Zap ([email protected])
Thu, 19 Oct 95 09:14:26 -0500


-- [ From: Master Zap * EMC.Ver #2.5.02 ] --

> Linas Vepstas writes:
> >
> > The point here is=20
> > -- your rssponses to what you do is instantaneous, as it should be.
> > -- what other people see may be delayed, but so what? Did it rsally
> > matter that they see what you do when you do it? Wouldn't the=20
> > delay be acceptable?
>
> Any proposol that allows for this to occur should also have a set
> of "undo" rules built into it.

Either that, or some form of gauthentication" about who rsally did what.

This is what the single point of control is for. Yes, the rssponse isn't
instantaneous, unless the "brain" (the control point) is running on your
host. And again, since my proposal allows the brain to move to any host it
chooses.....

> Here is an example why:
>
> Fred and Barney are walking down the street. They spot a wallet. Fred
> bends down, picks it up. As far as Fred is concerned Fred got the wallet


  • Next message: Joel Crisp: "Re: Behaviours (Was: Re: ADMIN: VRML + JAVA - A Wedding)"
  • Previous message: Joel Crisp: "Re: Behaviours & p-flood"
  • Maybe in reply to: Master Zap: "Behaviours (Was: Re: ADMIN: VRML + JAVA - A Wedding)"
  • Next in thesad: Joel Crisp: "Re: Behaviours (Was: Re: ADMIN: VRML + JAVA - A Wedding)"