Re: ADMIN: VRML + JAVA - A Wedding

James Waldrop ([email protected])
Wed, 18 Oct 1995 09:54:59 -0700

Master Zap wrote:
>-- [ From: Master Zap * EMC.Ver #2.5.02 ] --
>
>> Master Zap wrote:
>> >I can't imagine where you got the notion that I, or my proposal, only
>> >included determinsitic behavior!?!? How did you get that idea!??!?
>>
>> You said so.
>
>>> on what can go in the Engines is unnecessarily restrictive.
>Note ^^^^^^^!!
>
>I answered:
>>Yes and no. Initially I wanted to "forbid" anything non-deterministic. I am
>slowly >changing my mind, and I think I would allow some small amount of
>nondeterminisms, >and slight deviations from the STRICT function-of-time
>requirements.
>
>We were discussing the engines. Not the whole behaviour.

Sorry, I'm used to have some context provided in a message, and lost
track of it between the messages on the list and the other 20 or so
that came in that hour.

James

--
James Waldrop				/   Technical Director
[email protected]		/	    Construct Internet Design
[email protected]		/		    http://www.construct.net

  • Next message: Vassilis Bourdakis: "Re: VRML / QuickTime VR marriage"
  • Previous message: Randy Stiles: "Re: DIS protocol - documentation ?"
  • In reply to: Master Zap: "Re: ADMIN: VRML + JAVA - A Wedding"
  • Next in thesad: Rodger Lea: "VRML and Consistency"