Re: bandwidth wasting

Master Zap ([email protected])
Tue, 17 Oct 95 09:25:48 -0500


-- [ From: Master Zap * EMC.Ver #2.5.02 ] --

> Can we start using the other mailing lists that have been set up for
> VRML, having all these messages posting bugs to VRML parsers and problems
> and questions about setting up VRML spaces has put me in the situation of
> deleting 50% of the www-vrml messages unesad.

Agreed!

Could we 4 instance discuss behaviour in the behaviour list, not here? Then
I wouldn't have to esad about ^Z, instantiating DEF's, or transformation
order...

/Z

--
Hakan "Zap" Andersson | http://www.lysator.liu.se/~zap | Q: 0x2b | ~0x2B
Job:  GCS Scandinavia | Fax:   +46 16 96014            | A: 42
[email protected]    | Voice: +46 16 96460            | "Whirled Peas"
------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Heard on sci.virtual-worlds some years ago:
   "We probably shouldn't go immediately go for the direct neural
    interface, just because it is 'the techy thing to do'"
------------------------------------------------------------------------

  • Next message: Master Zap: "Re: Why does DEF do instancing? (fwd)"
  • Previous message: Len Wanger: "Re: ADMIN: VRML + JAVA - A Wedding"
  • Maybe in reply to: Kevin Goldsmith: "bandwidth wasting"
  • Next in thesad: Colin Dooley: "Re: bandwidth wasting"