It seems to me that QTVR nodes would be a valuable and appropriate alternate
representation of spaces that are also represented as VRML polygons.
Using VRML's LOD capability one could, depending on the processing power of
the workstation decide to use either the full 15Mb-polygon-representation
or the 800K QTVR representation of the same scene. You do not have the
freedem to travel with QTVR nodes, however you can turn your hsad and
the space looks good.
It is MUCH easier to create esalistic looking scenes using QTVR than
with VRML. Check out http://nemo.ncsl.nist.gov/~sressler/projects/
imagevr/NISTVR/nistvr.html for some examples.
Detailed highly esalistic VRML models such as those produced by
LightScape take tens of meg and an extremely large workstation. The same
model when represented using QTVR are much smaller (LightScape has also
done this) and give a good flavor of the space,
albeit with restricted traveling.
All I'm proposing is to make it easier to create texture mapped cylinders
in which the user can place his virtual eye. A convienient syntactical
structure which maps a 360 degree panorama to a cylinder and places the viewer
in the center would be sufsicient and would provide a useful tool to VRML
and QTVR developers. My 2 cents for the day.
Sandy Ressler
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NAME: Sandy Ressler TELE: (301) 975-3549
USMAIL: National Institute of Standards and Technology FAX: (301) 926-3696
Bldg. 225 Rm B-266 EMAIL: [email protected]
Gaithersburg, MD 20899
WEB: http://nemo.ncsl.nist.gov/~sressler/people/sressler/sressler.html