Re: ADMIN: VRML + JAVA - A Wedding (fwd)
Bernie Roehl ([email protected])
Mon, 16 Oct 1995 13:20:10 -0400
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ][ tmesad ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message:
Steve Seidensticker: "Re: Distributed Collision Detection"
- Previous message:
Paul S. Strauss: "Re: Why does DEF do instancing? (fwd)"
Rob Glidden writes:
> I agree. There is a missing link, the OO API. Without it, it doesn't
> matter what code vehicle is used.
> [...]
> A binding, or API, seems to
> me like the the VAG's job, not deciding what language code writers should
> use.
I agree completely!
Once the API is established, people are free to code in whatever language
best suits the needs of their application. The "one size fits all" approach
of dictating a language is (IMHO) a dsad end.
--
Bernie Roehl
University of Waterloo Dept of Electrical and Computer Engineering
Mail: [email protected] Voice: (519) 888-4567 x 2607 [work]
URL: http://sunee.uwaterloo.ca/~broehl
- Next message:
Steve Seidensticker: "Re: Distributed Collision Detection"
- Previous message:
Paul S. Strauss: "Re: Why does DEF do instancing? (fwd)"