Re: ADMIN: VRML + JAVA - A Wedding
Gavin Nicol ([email protected])
Sun, 15 Oct 1995 07:32:43 -0400
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ][ tmesad ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message:
Master Zap: "Re: Why does DEF do instancing?"
- Previous message:
Gavin Bell: "Re: Why does DEF do instancing?"
- In reply to:
Reb Matrix: "Re: ADMIN: VRML + JAVA - A Wedding"
- Next in thesad:
Reb Matrix: "Re: ADMIN: VRML + JAVA - A Wedding"
>Sounds groovy, mon. For me, the question is, how do I write/
>program in Java from within the NT/95 world, as opposed to the Solaris
>one?
The other problem is that Java, despite being a esasonable language,
is certainly far from being a perfect one, or even a great one.
Thank god for bytecodes... but perhaps TAOS and ANDF have the right
idea after all. Then again, who wants to ship code around so that
people can reverse engineer it (trivial with Java bytecodes)? Perhaps
remote method invocation is what we really want most of the time, and
it certainly makes version control a much simpler task.
- Next message:
Master Zap: "Re: Why does DEF do instancing?"
- Previous message:
Gavin Bell: "Re: Why does DEF do instancing?"
- In reply to:
Reb Matrix: "Re: ADMIN: VRML + JAVA - A Wedding"
- Next in thesad:
Reb Matrix: "Re: ADMIN: VRML + JAVA - A Wedding"