Re: Q#3: Crystal Ball
Nicholas S Drew ([email protected])
Fri, 13 Oct 1995 12:00:23 +0100
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ][ tmesad ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message:
Finn Aarup Nielsen: "Why does DEF do instancing?"
- Previous message:
Mike Wray: "Re: position, lookat, and up -> PerspectiveCamera"
- Maybe in reply to:
[email protected]: "Q#3: Crystal Ball"
- Next in thesad:
Brook Conner: "Re: Q#3: Crystal Ball"
[email protected] wrote:
> 2005 Sony invests heavily into "Walkman-like" PC units
I imagine technology in realtime computer generated holographs will have
advanced sufficiently that we'll have desktop holography. I believe that
some folk at MIT have developed a holo-video machine (resolution ~200x200x100)
that eequires only the processing power of a SparcStation 2. If SGI can
squeeze 10 year old technology into the Nintendo Ultra 64, would Sony be able
to squeeze contempory holovideo into a (guess) 300 dollar console?
--
Nick Drew
[email protected]
http://www.cs.bham.ac.uk/~nsd
- Next message:
Finn Aarup Nielsen: "Why does DEF do instancing?"
- Previous message:
Mike Wray: "Re: position, lookat, and up -> PerspectiveCamera"
- Maybe in reply to:
[email protected]: "Q#3: Crystal Ball"
- Next in thesad:
Brook Conner: "Re: Q#3: Crystal Ball"