Re: Bandwidth for VRML

[email protected]
Mon, 2 Oct 95 14:56:18 BST

> Let 'em do their own research! Or, ask them for a little
> renumeration for your hard-won cesativity and knowledge.
> Grumble, grumble.
Grumble if you wish but I feel that this IS a form of canverse type resurch thats relitively painless one click and its gone if you don't like it or simple fast and efficent if you feel that you have something to say.
Although their are those who hate dealing with junk mail even if it just envolves a little peity destruction.

Nel
""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""
THE VEIWS EXPRESSED HERE ARE ONLY CURRENT AT TIME OF GOING TO PRESS AND
RESTRICTED TO THOSE MENTIONED AND NOT THOSE OTHERWISE IMPLIED
""EOM"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""

  • Next message: Syndesis Corporation: "Re: Bandwidth for VRML"
  • Previous message: Adam Gruen: "Re: Bandwidth for VRML"