Re: LANG: Object Naming Proposal

Paul S. Strauss ([email protected])
Wed, 28 Jun 1995 15:31:17 -0400


On Jun 26, 12:36pm, Mark Waks wrote:

> Nathan proposes:
> >REF -- Assign a name to a node, without displaying

> Most of Nathan's proposal makes sense (in particular, I think we're
> going to need *some* ly
> through some kind of hierarchy); I just don't like this particular
> name. "PASSIVE DEF" is clumsy, but I think it's clearer than "REF"
> for this use. We can probably do better...

Keep in mind that whatever the name, this lichanism creates a subgraph
that is not used in or attached to any scene. It is sort of floating
out in space somewhere, waiting for someone to reference it by name.

Rather than introduce these "ghosts," why not create a node whose
responsibility is to define subgraphs without having them affect
rendering. For example:

Definitions {
DEF Car Separator { <stuff > }
DEF Boat Separator { <other stuff> }
...
}

(You might notice that this is a lot a Switch node with a different
name.)

--
Paul S. Strauss		[email protected]	Silicon Graphics Computer Systems
  Open Inventor Web info in http://www.sgi.com/Technology/Inventor.html

  • Next message: Mike HeckP "Re: Minor TGS flam>"
  • es"
  • Previous messag2039.html">Clem PadinP "WorldView Install Question #2"
  • Maybe in reply toPrevious messag1972.html">Nathan J. Stranb>P "LANG: Object Naming Proposal"
  • Next in threadPrevious messag2043.html">Mark WaksP "Re: LANG: Object Naming Proposal"