Ick. Gavin, that's a *pure* hack. It'll work, but it's colossolly
inaesthetic.
For now, you're right that this makes it a non-critical issue. But in
the long run, the language designer in me really thinks we should come
up with *something* that calls a spade a spade, and doesn't require the
user to think of tricks like this. (No, this is *not* obvious...)
-- Justin
Who suspects that "types" will become
important in the long run, and would
like to see better support than this...
Random Quote du Jour:
"One learns by doing, dear boy. Empiricism Uber Alles!"
-- from X-Men